
After a couple weeks of nose to the grindstone drudgery I decided that it was time to do something fun and go to a movie. I quickly perused the local showings and came up with “The Grey” (staring Liam Neeson). Based on the preview, this movie was perfect for my interests. The previews screamed action, wilderness and manliness. Little did I know that even with these elements combined, a film can still be a fantastic flop. Unfortunately, this was the case for “The Grey”. Now, I must preface this statement with a disclaimer. I am a HORRIBLE person to enjoy a film with because I have strong rational/analytical tendencies. This film brought them out and had me literally laughing in scenes where the suspense was supposed to be mounting. In general, the film lacked realism with respect to wilderness survival, human physiology, weaponry and wildlife behavior. If you still want to watch the film based on this assessment please discontinue reading, as the following portion has spoilers.
SPOILER WARNING
The film begins by setting up Neeson’s character as the rugged, troubled male archetype. This is by no means a stretch for Neeson’s acting, but he plays the role well. Neeson is a hired hunter who is employed to shoot problem wolves that are preying on Alaskan pipeline workers. Neeson and crew are stranded in the middle of Alaska after an airplance crash and are constantly beset by wolf attacks. This is your first hint as to the preposterousness of the plot. Wolves simply don’t attack humans on a regular enough basis to merit hiring someone for this role. In 2002 Mark McNay (Alaska Fish & Game) sought to collect data on all reported wolf attacks from 1900 to 2002. In total, McNay record 80 incidents, only 51 of which were aggressive in nature (http://fwp.mt.gov/fwpDoc.html?id=10996). Furthermore, of these 51 cases, 12 cases likely involved rabid wolves. These documents cases came from Alaska, Canada and Minnesota. In total, McNay estimated that there were up to 70,000 wolves in Canada and Alaska at the time of the study. Considering these figures, wolf attacks on humans are very rare.
The producers of “The Grey” did not let such facts get into the way of their storyline. The depiction of wolves in this film is ridiculous. Wolves in “The Grey” attack in solitary (against their pack hunting nature), in frontal assaults and amidst encircling campfires. The pack that Neeson and friends must endure take each and opportunity to kill. When this happens the wolves kill out of anger/territoriality/vengeance, not out of hunger. Ummm…what? It is also important to note that these wolves are obviously taking anabolic steroids. They are huge! According to the International Wolf Center, male Alaskan Grey Wolves usually weigh between 85 and 115 lbs. They may occasionally weigh 130 lbs (http://www.wolf.org/wolves/learn/basic/faqs/faq.asp). Based on proportional dimension comparisons, the wolves in the film must weigh 250-300 lbs.
Although the wolf depiction is the most farcical aspect of the film, the survival tactics and weaponry used in the film are not far behind. As his primary hunting weapon, Neeson uses a Remington Model 700 in an unknown chambering. This makes some sense because of the 700’s heritage as a dependable, accurate and versatile hunting rifle. However, Neeson’s particular 700 is blued steel and stocked in walnut—an inexpressibly poor choice considering the weather conditions of Alaska. After the plane crash Neeson recovers his rifle and a box of 12 gauge shotgun shells (though we never see a shotgun). The rifle’s stock is broken, but instead of attempting to mend the stock (electrical tape is used thoroughout the film) or firing it in a makeshift manner, Neeson simply discards it. Not so for the shotgun shells! Neeson takes the shotgun shells and attaches them to whittled poles with electrical tape in an attempt to fashion a bang-stick. Never mind the fact that it is absolutely impossible for a piece of wood to detonate a 209 shotgun primer (electrical taped on) by jabbing it into a wolf’s side. It works! At this point I simply lost interest in the film. But wait, there is more! After Neeson and crew successfully use their bang-sticks to kill a wolf, they completely discard all weapons until the final scene. This happens despite the fact that each person carries a hunting knife large enough to make Rambo jealous. Apparently it never occurs to them to fashion a makeshift spear with a 8” carbon steel blade at the end. That would make far too much sense! The final scene reaches a zenith of absurdity when Neeson combats the alpha wolf (400 lbs) by (and I kid you not) electrical-taping miniature alcohol bottles to his hands and then busting them on a nearby rock. I am just going to let that sink in for a moment. Go ahead, take your time digesting that bit of weaponology. I’m sure that suburban teenagers in New Jersey will be doing this and broadcasting it on Youtube shortly after they see the film.
The survival failures in the film depressed me less than the wolf portrayal and the weapon absurdity. This is mainly because very few films and very few survival reality televisions shows get it right. [Yes, I am looking at you Bear Grylls!] The number of survival sins committed in the film are endless, but notably the gaggle of survivors relocated from the scene of the plane crash despite having a locating beacon. The most fantastical act of lunacy (straight out of “Man vs. Wild”) was when the group make an improvised rope by tying together shirts, fabric, string, etc and then decided to jump into a 300 ft. chasm in hopes of latching onto an evergreen tree mid-flight. Of course, it worked! Three out of four people managed to survive that experience. The one man that did die was afraid of heights, had a bandaged (non-functioning) hand and had a zipper-pull caught in the improvised rope. Minor survival infractions included the copious consumption of alcohol in -10 F weather and diving into rivers.
In conclusion, “The Grey” had several exciting and suspenseful scenes. Neeson couldn’t have played his role better, but the role itself was a worn-out archetype. The utter and total disregard for realism killed the rest of the movie. This film merits 2 out of 5 stars for me, simply because it managed to put wilderness + manliness + action on a screen in front of me.
"The Grey" movie poster included under Fair Use Law (commentary).


