Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Good Medicine



By the 29th of November, 2017 I had already been deer hunting hard for twelve days. On the first day that I was able to take rifle in hand I met with a wide 7 pt. whitetail buck amidst roaring winds in Oklahoma’s Northern Crosstimbers. This was the first time that I had shot a truly mature buck on opening day since 2013. Yet, satisfied as I was with this harvest, I was not about to recline by the stove just yet. I was determined to stock the freezer with deer—even if it took hunting hard in two states. Though the first deer came easy, the second proved a greater challenge. Several hundred miles north, I had hunted riverbottoms, oak ridges, and bare-dirt fields with no sight of deer. All of this had been done on dearly-earned vacation days too. Then, on Thursday, the 29th the nature of my fortune seemed to shift on the wind.

For the evening hunt, I settled on a public hunting area where I had success a few years prior—hoping beyond hope that it had not already been occupied by a blaze orange army of public land hunters. To my surprise, it had not. The frontage of this property was a cut cornfield nearly a half mile deep, which bordered thick timber. I intended to hunt a bottom where I had placed a ladder stand the year before, but my initial survey of the landscape revealed that although the cornfield had long-since been cut, there were two remaining patches of standing corn separated by a mowed channel approximately 50 yards across. I slinked several feet into the woods, bracing against a large oak, and proceeded to weave pliable saplings into a sort of makeshift cross-fence in front of me. I sat at this location for approximately 30 minutes, just long enough for the woods to settle, when I became aware of the din of machinery. “What on God’s green earth is that?”, I thought to myself. Then it hit me—the sound was coming from farm equipment. Caddy-corner from my location and under a mile away was another corn field. It sounded like this one was just now being cut.

Abandoning my brush blind, I took long strides back to my truck with full intent on pre-empting the imagined droves of deer that were hearing the very same corn harvest that was. A farm crew of an unexpectedly high number of pickups, semis, and combines were buzzing around the scene like so many bees. As I hoofed it into the area another semi came up behind me and I couldn’t help but give a sheepish grin when the driver waved at me, bedecked like some sort of gargantuan day-glo orange pumpkin. But, they all knew what I was about. I quickly positioned myself away from the ongoing work and facing a safe shooting zone amidst the double row of standing corn that is often left when public land agricultural fields are harvested.

As the work tapered off and the crew began to head home, animal life seemed to manifest itself from thin air. Birds of all manner descended on the field in cackling, scratching, squadrons. There was so much crop residue on the ground that they had a veritable cornucopia all for the picking. As soon as the last truck pulled away I heard a decidedly mammalian rustling behind me. My back was to a slim finger of timber that separated two forks of the field and I couldn’t believe that something larger than a squirrel had waited out all of the whirring, smoking Fords and John Deeres. But, there it was again—the distinctive rustling of corn stalks just behind me! It was in the worst possible position. I had expected the deer to emerge about 200 yards in front of me and browse towards me; I was in no position to take a shot behind with the .338 rifle laid upon my lap. Instead, as a rustling grew louder, I eased my .44 revolver from the pancake holster on my right hip and prepared to take a one-handed, gunfighter-style shot at the approaching deer.

 No such thing happened. As I craned my neck to the right I immediately saw the bushy tail of Canis latrans—the coyote. Coyote and I have come to a little bit of understanding as of late and I’m a bit less prejudiced against him than I was once was (thanks in no small part to Dan Flores’ excellent book American Coyote). Perhaps more importantly, I was not about to ruin what could turn out to be my last best chance. As he sauntered away obliviously I knew that we had reached magic hour. If you’ve spent much time deer hunting you know exactly what I am talking about. Magic hour is the period of last light approximately 30 minutes before sunset to 30 minutes after sunset. Deer, being crepuscular animals, often move about at this time.

Beyond magic hour, however, there was something special about the moment I was experiencing. It wasn’t just the combination of habitat, weather, and timing. It was medicine. Good medicine are those extraordinary moments and places where you are truly immersed in nature and get to see behind the veil. You are able to witness ongoings that seem either too private or too incredible to be experienced by ordinary people. In Tom Brown Jr’s biography Tracker, the conceptualization of medicine is laid out based on Tom’s world-class tracking and his instruction from Apache tracker Stalking Wolf:

Good medicine is any experience so memorable that it just has to be a gift from the spirit-that-moves-through all things. Good medicine announced its presence in marvelous sights, wondrous happenings. Good medicine was also any mystery, no matter how small, whose solution opened to larger, more wondrous mysteries

The cacophony of birds and the close encounter with coyote had me convinced that I was in the middle of good medicine. Yet, strain my eyes as I may in the fading light I was unable to make out the dancing forms of whitetails in the field. The oversized and glowing full moon gave them ample opportunity to wait for the cooler hours of night. I would not put knife to hide this day.



Sunday, December the third was another atypically balmy day for meteorological winter. I returned to the area around 3:30 PM after several hours of still-hunting a few miles down the road. Given that I had expected to shoot a deer resting against a blowdown I was packing an entirely different type of rifle: a Winchester 1885 in Theodore Roosevelt’s favorite .405 Winchester. It wouldn’t allow me to take a deer at 400 yards, but it would anchor a fleeing buck with authority. It was an atavistic arm to choose and being equipped with only iron sights it was probably foolhardy to take it on a public land hunt. But, I enjoyed carrying it and its charisma couldn’t be matched. I walked in with it and a much smaller ditty bag than usual. Instead of a frame-pack full of paraphernalia I simply had a leather belt slide full of .405 rounds that was made by my local leather shop and a waxed canvas parcel which included a headlamp, a spare knife, and surgical gloves. Something about a lighter kit is freeing. It makes you want to walk farther and hunt harder.

At the field’s margin I scanned the perimeter with my binoculars and noted for the first time a fresh-looking rub in a location that I had not hunted since 2015. Since the corn field was immense and I had no real way of knowing where the deer might emerge I figured that a setup near the rub would be as good as any. Thus, I wedged myself against a small cedar and began to wait. My view over the field was limited by the terrain to about 100 yards, but that was perfect for the old .405 rifle. Behind me another large corn field stretched for close to a half mile.


The first unexpected incident occurred when a very confused cottontail rabbit ran into my outstretched boot. It downright jolted me and I said “hey rabbit” far too loudly. At this point I thought that I had probably ruined my chances for a deer but sat it out nonetheless. About 4:50 PM (just the beginning of the magic hour) I turned to examine the field behind me and witnessed two deer walking into its cut rows. The deer were not yet aware of me and were about 100 yards away at this time. However, when I raised the rifle I was unable to make them out in the tang sight. I had not counted on the height of the surrounding prairie grass, which made accurate sighting impossible.

I decided to take a chance. I belly-crawled a few feet past the tallest grass and sat back up. One of the deer had obviously seen the movement and was leaving the scene with a small degree of discomfort. The other yet remained and I was able to place the big brass bead of a front sight on it before it departed. I remember nothing about the shot—neither the trigger breaking nor the heavy recoil lingers in my memory. Yet, the deer was down instantaneously and I rushed over to it, overcome with gladness and a sense of blessing for being able to live out this moment. As I field-dressed the deer and dragged out the half-mile back to my truck I couldn’t help but think that this place was good medicine indeed.



Sunday, August 27, 2017

Foray List - 26 August 2017

Yellow Chanterelle
Cantharellus “cibarus”


Lobster Mushroom
Hypomyces Lactifluorum



Genus Russula, species unknown


Genus Russula, species unknown #2


Genus Boletus, species unknown (detached from stem when found)


Reishi
Ganoderma sessile / Ganoderma lucidium


Artist’s Conk
Ganoderma applanatnum



Gemmed Puffball
Lycoperdon perlatum


Purple-Gilled Laccaria
Laccaria ochropurpurea


No Common Name
Lactarius psammicola (low confidence)


False Turkey Tai (no photo)
Stereum ostrea

Genus Xerula, Species Unknown


Short-Stemmed Russula
Russula brevipes



Wednesday, August 16, 2017

On Dutch Spinsters & Punching Nazis



Betsie and Corrie Ten Boom


I've often been told by people that I respect that they "don't believe in coincidence." There reaches a point where the confluence of 'coincidence' is just too great to accept; a person must then realize that these occurrences have real meaning and that a lesson is to be learned. I had this realization recently, as I considered the reporting on the tragic and sickening events in Charlottesville, VA . Back in early June I had the opportunity to spend a week in Charlottesville on business. I had looked forward to the trip for over a year, as I was would be able to check off a life-long dream of hiking Shenandoah National Park and also avoid traveling to D.C. (which despite its many fine qualities, is not for me). My Charlottesville experience was quite positive, though I spent more time hoofing it down the Appalachian Trail and looking for exciting fungi then I did soaking up the city itself. No doubt though, it had the veneer of southern culture that I relished: excellent food, friendly people, and a charming spirit of university town-meets mountains. Did I mention Bojangles? I still crave Bojangles! 



With Charlottesville fresh in my memory and having just finished two books on prison camps (Escape from Camp 14 by Blaine Harden and The Hiding Place by Corrie Ten Boom) I was particularly enraptured by the coverage of the Neo-Nazi march and tragic death that occurred in C-Ville. Perhaps though, even if I had not had these experiences I would have been overwhelmed by the media frenzy surrounding the national tragedy. With the rise of the so-called Alt-Right there seems to have a tremendous body of social media and traditional media hubbub on the topic. This culminated in a 21 January 2017 New York Times piece by Liam Stack that asked the seemingly rhetorical question, Is it O.K. to Punch a Nazi?. A great nazi-punching volunteer brigade materialized out of nowhere overnight. Google Trends quantifies this emergence:



Now the spectre of Neo-Nazis is not relegated to the classic Blues Brothers (1980) bridge scene (caution *language*), it is a present reality in the heartland of America. In fact, in the two last cities in which I have lived I have seen posters for both the white supremacist group Identity Evropa and the oppositional movement, Antifa. Nazi-punching is now both an aspirational pastime for some and an internet trope for others. What then, should I do if confronted by a Nazi spectacle? The smart aleck in me, of course, would remark that the best solution would be to purchase “...the greatest battle implement ever devised,” an M1 Garand, if Nazis were making a comeback. Yet, that perspective changed dramatically after I concluded my reading of The Hiding Place.

The Hiding Place details the journey of a Dutch watch-making family prior to, and during, World War II. The opening scenes made me desperately want to travel to Holland, meet the people, and amble the quaint streets and markets. Yet, before the first few chapters were done I knew that this picturesque setting was bound to change. The Ten Boom family gradually becomes members of a rebellious underground that hides, serves, and loves all classes of undesireables. The book culminates in the discovery of this work and the subsequent time served at the Ravensbruk concentration camp. At Ravensbruk, two Dutch spinster sisters (Corrie and Betsie) go about not only sharing the Gospel with the inmates, but also with a series of administrators and German military officers. In particular, Betsie displays an amazing gift of forgiveness for the people that enslaved, tortured, and abused her. Her sister Corrie struggles with this act initially, despite knowing that it was in accordance to God’s direction. Nonetheless, after finally being released and making an arduous journey back to her home in Haarlem she opens her own house to the Dutch traitors who sided with the Germans and informed on the like of her family.

How can anyone but marvel at the dedication and faith of such an act? The Hiding Place was for me one of the rare books that deeply moves and fundamentally reshapes perspectives. While I have no doubt that my failings are so great as would cause me to balk in a similar circumstance, the lesson of the book is not in the power of people to do good, but in the power of God to do good through people.

As flawed people, we could not hope to muster such incredible grace on our own. God must be the progenitor of this virtue. He equips us to do this work through his Holy Spirit. What then, should we do to Nazis? We should do the same unto them as we should do to Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin; we should pray for them.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away. Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Knife Review: Vehement Knives Wharncliffe EDC

Vehement Wharncliffe EDC and a Flush of Wood Ear


Since late June 2016 I’ve had a constant companion at my side: the Vehement Knives Wharncliffe EDC. I’ve long been a wharncliffe aficionado and wanted to give Vehement Knives’ rendition a try for quite some time. When Vehement Knives ran a very good sale in November 2016, I just couldn’t take it any more. This was to be my first custom knife! It also would mark the single most expensive knife that I had ever purchased and one that I would wait quite some time for. Was it worth it? Absolutely. My purpose here is to give my honest impression of the knife.

The Perfect Equipment for a Forest Excursion


Here are the basics:

Original Retail Price (Not on Sale) - $200

Steel – 154 CM

Composition of 154 CM is typically 1.05% Carbon, 0.35% Silicon, 13.50-14.00% Chromium, and 4.0% Molybdenum according to KnifeCenter.com. 154 CM is considered a good high carbon knife steel with excellent edge retention properties and decent corrosion resistance.

Blade Profile – Modified Wharncliffe

A traditional Wharncliffe blade features a flat cutting edge and a gently curving spine. Vehement Knives’ version actually has a slightly recurved blade, which makes it better for cuts involving a drawing or pulling motion, but performs less satisfactorily for chopping. This style of blade is particularly appropriate for defensive knife work.

Blade Length and Width – 3” cutting edge (as measured straight across) and 3/8” thick until the spine curvature begins

Handle Type and Material – Two piece canvas micarta scales (natural color), 3/4” across the handle

Construction – Unibody, with rear lanyard hole

Sheath – Custom kydex with Blade-Tech Tek-Lok

These basic facts can only tell you so much. Here is my subjective opinion regarding what the knife is good at:


Vehement Wharncliffe EDC and a Prime Yellow Chanterelle


FORAGING

Over the 7 months that I have been using the EDC I have enlisted it in a number of tasks. Some of these it was practically designed for—others were pretty unreasonable give the knife’s intent. To begin with, I have become somewhat of mushroom fancier as of late, a mycophile if you will. I’ve found that even when the fish aren’t biting and game is uncooperative you can traipse around the woods and finding interesting, often edible mushrooms. I’m glad to spend my leisure time this way! There is actually a considerable niche in the knife world for specialty mushroom knifes. Typically, these are characterized as folding knives with a deeply recurved blade (typically a hawk bill profile) that may or may not feature an integrated brush. The archetypical mushroom knife is produced by Opinel and features a wood handle and a locking collar. Opinel knives are classy, respected, and very continental. While these are all good things, I wanted a mushroom knife more suitable for an American outdoorsman. The Wharncliffe EDC fits this role exceedingly well. The curvature of the blade makes it perfect for precisely cutting mushroom stipes (like the Opinel) but you could also wield it fairly effectively as a defensive weapon (unlike the Opinel).


Opinel Mushroom Knife



PARING

From a culinary perspective, the Wharncliffe EDC also excels in peeling fruits and vegetables. I mentioned before that the recurved blade is good at pull-cutting---it really shows in the kitchen. In fact, if you were to examine the best samples of paring knives the blades would closely resemble that of the Wharncliffe EDC.

ROPE WORK

Most cordage is processed through a drawing motion and here the Wharncliffe reigns supreme. Folk tradition attributes the development of the Wharncliffe-style blade to sailor-folk. This makes logical sense on its face because of the need to prevent punctures on the rolling seas and the need to quickly cut rope. However, such claims regarding the development of the Wharncliffe seem tenuous, at best.

PRECISE CUTS

The fine tip of the Wharncliffe EDC and the pronounced choil mean that you can choke up on the knife and perform detail cuts with ease. Applications for this style of cutting range from scribing wood to remove a thorn from your finger-tip.

From Harvesting Mushrooms to Cleaning Squirrel


GENERAL OVERVIEW

My overall impression of the knife is that it is a robust, beautiful piece of functional artwork. The knife has been handy in day-to-day chores like opening boxes or obnoxious plastic packaging which I suspect is the primary duty for most everyday carry (EDC) blades. It is, however, unlike any knife in my personal collection (which has previously been largely dedicated to skinning or butchery). The only area that the Wharncliffe falls a bit short is in processing game. However, that is not flaw in the design, rather it is an issue with applying the wrong tool for the job. Nonetheless, I have incidentally taken small game (including rabbit and squirrel) while foraging and employed the knife successful in the skinning, gutting, and break-down of these critters.

Due to its small size, the knife can be easily concealed under an untucked shirt. Likewise, the short blade length (3”) means that the knife may be excluded from ‘dangerous weapon’ restrictions in some jurisdictions. Nonetheless it could likely be wielded as a formidable defensive tool if circumstances required such. My only hesitation in using the knife in this capacity is the brevity of the handle. Though  I don’t claim to be a defensive knife expert, I would prefer to see at least another 1” of handle space for better grip purchase. For those looking for a dedicated defensive wharncliffe, Vehement offers the fearsome Wharlock.

The included kydex sheath is the single best sheath I have owned. The knife fits in the sheath securely and comes out in a flash. The form-fitting kydex does not dull the blade upon withdrawal and the Tek-Lok provides complete adaptability. The fit and finish of the knife are very good overall. The high polish on the metalwork has remained very attractive despite hard use and exposure to occasional showers. I have oiled the knife infrequently and it has never developed any rust spots whatsoever. Edge retention on the knife has been good, but I do find edge touch-up to be a more difficult process with the knife’s recurved blade. Vehement typically recommends blade touch-up with a leather strop loaded with a honing compound.  

I would certainly consider myself a very satisfied customer of Vehement Knives. During my impatient waiting for the knife to be delivered, owners Matt and Jenna Martin were very gracious in answering my frequent (often annoying) questions. Vehement Knives was originally based in Longmont, Colorado but has since relocated to Gladstone, Michigan. Matt doesn’t appear to be accepting custom orders on his website due to backlog but you can purchase ready-made Vehement products from Knives Ship Free. Although it takes me a long time to save enough pennies to purchase a quality knife, I can’t help but think about some one-off Japanese-inspired blades that I have seen on the Vehement Knives Facebook page. Maybe one of these days...



Wednesday, January 18, 2017

An Anthem for 2017

Our Banner in the Sky, Frederic Edwin Church

Every political campaign worth its salt has to have a catchy slogan. This isn’t written down anywhere, but is an implied and inviolable rule of marketing. It is a simple matter of heuristics. If you can easily recall a short and pointed catchphrase then you are more likely to spend time contemplating that particular product or person.  I’d argue that De Beers has one of the best slogans: Diamonds Are Forever. It is so successful, in fact, that pretty much every sod that gets married is required to buy a diamond for his betrothed or face incalculable disdain, unending questions, and disapproving looks. The foreverness of diamonds has, for ages, symbolized the foreverness of marriage. You didn’t purchase a lasting gemstone? You have no right to expect a lasting marriage!  For better or worse, most Americans are beholden to a powerful social norm that necessitates that we buy diamonds. Perhaps that is why De Beers controlled 90% of the global diamond trade for a number of years.

Yet, despite the outrageous cleverness of some catchphrases, political campaigns often don’t have the astuteness of De Beers. Take, for instance, Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1936 campaign slogan: Sunflowers Die in November. What!? As it turns out, Roosevelt was running against Kansas Republican Alf Landon. Thus, since Landon hailed from the Sunflower State, Roosevelt’s slogan was meant to forecast his defeat in the general election. Roosevelt’s forecast was true and Landon lost in a landslide.  The efficacy of the political slogan seems unlikely to have been a major contributing factor.

Fast forward to 2016 and the current President Elect’s successful campaign slogan was Make America Great Again. Let that soak in for a while! Regardless of your political leanings (and I’m not here to talk about that), one has to admit that this phrase is quite loaded. On its very face, there are a number of implicit assumptions:

1. America was once great

2. America is no longer great

3. It is possible, through voting, to elevate a candidate to office who will restore America’s greatness



In order to really evaluate this phrase, we have to examine the importance of America’s greatness in the first place. Why do we care about it? Why is it critical that we be a unipolar international hegemon? The answer is because many of us have either an implicit or explicit acceptance of the principle of American Exceptionalism.  Simply put, American Exceptionalism is an ideology where the United States of America exists separate from and better than the rest of the nations of the world. American Exceptionalism is a mainstream ideology, at least among Americans.

This much can be easily demonstrated by surveying the past testimonies of U.S. Presidents. American Exceptionalism is perfectly described by former U.S. President Reagan in his retiring address, wherein he quotes Massachusetts Bay Colony leader John Winthrop:

    The past few days when I've been at that window upstairs, I've thought a bit of the 'shining city upon a hill.' The phrase comes from John Winthrop, who wrote it to describe the America he imagined. What he imagined was important because he was an early Pilgrim, an early freedom man. He journeyed here on what today we'd call a little wooden boat; and like the other Pilgrims, he was looking for a home that would be free. I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That's how I saw it, and see it still.

    And how stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous, more secure, and happier than it was eight years ago. But more than that: After 200 years, two centuries, she still stands strong and true on the granite ridge, and her glow has held steady no matter what storm. And she's still a beacon, still a magnet for all who must have freedom, for all the pilgrims from all the lost places who are    hurtling through the darkness, toward home.


Reagan’s oratory prowess has been unmatched by American Presidents, until perhaps the administration of Barack Obama. Like Reagan, Obama too was a self-professing believer in American Exceptionalism yet his viewpoint appears to be tempered by the recognition of the contributions of other nations:

I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in    British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism. I’m enormously proud of my country and its role and history in the world. If you think about the site of this summit and what it means, I don’t think America should be embarrassed to see evidence of the sacrifices of our troops, the enormous amount of resources that were put into Europe postwar, and our leadership in crafting an Alliance that ultimately led to the unification of Europe. We should take great pride in that.

And if you think of our current situation, the United States remains the largest    economy in the world. We have unmatched military capability. And I think that we have a core set of values that are enshrined in our Constitution, in our body of law, in our democratic practices, in our belief in free speech and equality, that, though imperfect, are exceptional.


In appears then that Mr. Trump follows in the footsteps of his predecessors in believing in this nationalistic perspective. At least, he did believe in it at some point. Make America Great Again could easily be rewritten as Make America Exceptional Again. Can we really make America exceptional through voting? Have we then made America exceptional again?

I think not.

This isn’t because I don’t have confidence in the President Elect or because I might disagree with his policies. I don’t believe that we have made America exceptional again because doing so isn’t as simple as checking a box on a ballot. Furthermore, I would posit that American Exceptionalism as a result of geo-strategic location, natural resources, guiding documents, or political institutions does not exist. Rather, exceptionalism, true exceptionalism, is the product of righteousness.

During those times where American exceptionalism peaked, national righteousness was leading the curve. When American exceptionalism faltered, so too did American righteousness wane. Yet, by even mentioning the word righteousness I have already disenfranchised half of my readership. But, hear me out. Righteousness too is a loaded term. I have found that the standard response to the term righteousness is a visceral shuddering. People simply don’t like the term. Righteousness instantly evokes bitter memories of encounters with hypocrites who looked down their noses and judged you harshly, despite their own shortcomings.

The fact is that those people are not righteous. Rather, they are self-righteous. The difference is night and day. From a Biblical perspective, true righteousness represents “ethical conduct that conforms to God’s standards and moral character” (Weirsbe, Warren, Be Skillful, pg. 150). The Hebrew word for righteousness throughout much of the Bible is tsaddiq (צַדִּיק). The best synonyms that we can find for this word are just and blameless. These words don’t have the baggage that righteousness does. If I were to assert that exceptionalism is the product of justice or blamelessness then the reaction is likely to be much less negative.

The Book of Proverbs offers multiple reassurances that national exceptionalism is, in fact, the product of righteousness (11:10-11, 14:34):

    When it goes well with the righteous, the city rejoices;
    And when the wicked perish, there is jubilation.
    By the blessing of the upright the city is exalted,
    But it is overthrown by the mouth of the wicked.

    Righteousness exalts a nation,
    But sin is a reproach to any people.


The reason that we find self-righteousness so loathsome is that its claim to correctness is derived from the person who exhibits the characteristic. Oftentimes, these persons are deeply flawed. Thus, the source of the righteousness is compromised. In practice, a self-righteous person is like a doctor instructing you to treat a case of dehydration by drinking from a poisoned well. Yet, true righteousness is not derived from sinful people but from a sinless God (II Corinthians 5:20-21):

 Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God. For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Given this context, I wholeheartedly agree that we should make America great again! I personally am tremendously broken and subject to all sorts of missteps. But, I know that the source of righteous does not come from within me, but rather from God. American greatness is dependent on American righteousness. American righteousness is dependent upon our knowledge of the Word, our relationship with Christ, and our willingness to do God’s works.

 For 2017, won’t you join me in this anthem?


 MAKE AMERICA RIGHTEOUS AGAIN